),王飞杰(),黄丽洁,越丽霞,赵天云,王志霞
),WANG Fei-jie(),HUANG Li-jie,YUE Li-xia,ZHAO Tian-yun,WANG Zhi-xia
|
目的 汉化护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感量表（Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses,PUM-SES）,并检测该量表的信效度。 方法 采用Brislin模式对PUM-SES量表进行翻译、回译及跨文化调适,形成中文版PUM-SES量表。请6名专家进行2轮内容效度评价。便利选取河南省4所三级甲等医院1 190名临床护士,采用中文版PUM-SES量表进行调查,评价量表的信度和效度。 结果 中文版PUM-SES量表内容效度指数为0.967,探索性因子分析得到4个公因子,与原量表结构相同,累计方差贡献率为74.93%,验证性因子分析χ2/df=2.87、RMR=0.02、RMSEA=0.06、GFI=0.97、AGFI=0.95、TLI=0.93、IFI=0.91、CFI=0.97、PGFI=0.51,均达到适配（拟合）标准;中文版PUM-SES量表Cronbach’s α系数为0.948,重测信度为0.932。结论 中文版PUM-SES量表信效度较好,可以作为评估护士压力性损伤管理自我效能感的工具。
Objective To translate the Pressure Ulcer Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses （PUM-SES） into Chinese,and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PUM-SES. Methods Brislin’s model was used to translate,back-translate,and culturally adjust the Chinese version of PUM-SES. Six experts were invited to conduct 2 rounds of content validity evaluation. A total of 1190 clinical nurses were recruited by convenient sampling from four tertiary hospitals in Henan province. Results The content validity index（CVI） of the PUM-SES was 0.967. The exploratory factor analysis（EFA） indicated four factors explaining 74.93% of the total variances,the structure is consistent with the original scale. The confirmatory factory analysis（CFA） indicated all measurements fit exceeded the recommended criteria：χ2/df=2.87,RMR=0.02,RMSEA=0.06,GFI=0.97,AGFI=0.95,TLI=0.93,IFI=0.91,CFI=0.97,PGFI=0.51. The Cronbach’s α of the PUM-SES was 0.948,and the test-retest reliability was 0.932 in this study. Conclusion The Chinese version of the PUM-SES was proved to be reliable and valid and can effectively assess the self-efficacy of nurses’ management of pressure ulcers in China.